6 ms·
that rings true. and devs dont usually pay for dev tools. the only way I see them having any success is if they gain significant market adoption however I appl
by markcollin 3y ago
that rings true. and devs dont usually pay for dev tools. the only way I see them having any success is if they gain significant market adoption
however I applaud the effort trying to innovate in the saturated field. Almost every alternative on that list except thunder client is vc funded. I still can't wrap my head around postmans 5.6b val lol
- Zetobal 3y agoIt's convenience and nothing else that's all these tools have going for them. It's just to catch lazy bastards out who based their whole workflow on it. It's the scummiest way to do business and everyone associated with it gets on my private "Don't do business with"-list.
- djbusby 3y agoWell, when they become/are the major player (close to monopoly) and then can ratchet up some enterprise crap, then do the 10% per year squeeze - well, that's what VCs believe in (and buy). A 10x multiple means they "only" need $500M TTM to justify to the next mark. And, these big valuation help with the IPO, loads of folk love to buy hyped up IPO.