Unfortunately i dont see yours either. We have governments arguing against stronger encryption due to fears of going dark. Which means against having secure sys

Unfortunately i dont see yours either. We have governments arguing against stronger encryption due to fears of going dark. Which means against having secure systems. This is in addition to a lot of government agencies sitting on, and investing into the knowledge about vulnerabilities. Some of the more public ones getting fixed doesnt change the overall vulnerability of the system. There is a clear incentive mismatch. One cant pretend that those vulnerabilities are "safe" due to only spooks knowing of them. If you can find them, so can others. Especially if you are actively exploiting them. I would argue that this shows both an unwillingness to accept improvements in security as well as actively degrading the current state. And this is before talking about governments actively adding vulnerabilities, which now even possible by law in some jurisdictions.