5 ms·
We should push for GPL licensing then, which AFAIK requires a source that can be built from.
by cfuendev 3y ago
We should push for GPL licensing then, which AFAIK requires a source that can be built from.
- monocasa 3y agoWe just also shouldn't call releases with no source "open source". I wouldn't really have a complaint with their source being released as Apache 2. I just don't want the term "open source" diluted to including just a release of build artifacts.