6 ms·
How is that light weight? let's see it has scripts for skeloton projects/models/etc, has it's own orm's, and even ships with its own package manager. that see
by my8bird 14y ago
How is that light weight? let's see it has scripts for skeloton projects/models/etc, has it's own orm's, and even ships with its own package manager. that seems like a lot of stuff is you're looking to light weight.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- ericflo 14y agoWow, what a hostile response.
- rohitarondekar 14y agoI think he meant [ u s e r @ma c h i n e E x amp l e ] $ . . / mo n o r a i l . j s i n s t a l l mo o t o o l s
- mudetroit 14y agoThe M in MVC has nothing to do with database persistence. That is a wonderful perception that rails and its ilk have given us, for better or worse. You could build a complete system that fully implements MVC without database persistence, or really any persistence at all.
- lucisferre 14y agoFor your enlightenment MVC isn't what you think it means. http://andrzejonsoftware.blogspot.ca/2011/09/rails-is-not-mvc.html http://andrzejonsoftware.blogspot.ca/2011/09/rails-is-not-mv... Even if you are using the Rails version of the term MVC, as one commenter was keen to point out, it still has nothing to do with having data persistence or not.
- firefoxman1 14y ago"How is that light weight?" Look at the description: "Monorail.js will never force you to install anything not needed for your project. The goal is to use what you need." Plus, it's definitely lighter than express.
- lojack 14y agoAs far as I can tell, this actually uses express.
- firefoxman1 14y agoAh, I stand corrected. I apologize. I think if I were to use a node MVC framework built on express, I'd go with Matador: http://obvious.github.com/matador/ http://obvious.github.com/matador/
- armnhammer 14y agoMatador actually looks pretty sweet.