6 ms·
> To change this, we should require some kind of supermajority to confirm judicial appointments at all levels. That was the de facto situation until 2013 (unti
by __derek__ 3y ago
> To change this, we should require some kind of supermajority to confirm judicial appointments at all levels.
That was the de facto situation until 2013 (until 2017 for the Supreme Court).[1] The Republican SCOTUS majority became entrenched when Mitch McConnell refused to allow the Senate to consider Merrick Garland in early 2016, though. That wasn't luck.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_option#2013:_Cloture_on_nominations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_option#2013:_Cloture_o...
- leereeves 3y agoNo, it wasn't luck, it was a consequence of the 2014 election, in which the Republicans won net 9 Senate seats.