5 ms·

>But, we emphasize the limited reach of our decision today. We do not uphold the injunction against all the officials named in the complain

• Karunamon 3y ago
  >As explained in Part IV above, the district court erred in finding that the NIAID Officials, CISA Officials, and State Department Officials likely violated Plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights. So, we exclude those parties from the injunction. Accordingly, the term “Defendants” as used in this modified provision is defined to mean only the following entities and officials included in the original injunction: [Followed up by a page and 1/4 of people and agencies who the injunction still applies to] In no way is it honest to describe this as "overturned".