6 ms·
One of the authors here, happy to answer questions.
by vchuravy 3y ago
One of the authors here, happy to answer questions.
- Cthulhu_ 3y agoPh'nglui mwgl'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn?
- contravariant 3y agoYou had a perfectly good opportunity to call a function madness and then descend into it, why didn't you?
- philipov 3y agoThis could be a feature request.
- vchuravy 3y agoAh but what defines madness? For me it's innocuous functions that have surprising/wild behavior due to type inference disagreeing with me. Most of the time I am the one wrong.
- sundarurfriend 3y agoChanging the `function foo()` in the "Usage: descend" section to `function madness()` sounds like a pretty good/funny idea. @descend madness() would be a pretty good reference to the original text! Positive: it would also let people know at a glance that things like `rand() > 0.5 ? Int64 : Float64` are indeed madness. Potential negative: some people may not consider it super DEI-friendly? As a neurodivergent person, I'd just find it to be just a lovely reference though.
- drt5b7j 3y ago[flagged]