7 ms·
I think in this case "better" reduces to convincing the upstream data source to not use json. Putting that frustration on jq seems like a case of transference.
by ustolemyname 3y ago
I think in this case "better" reduces to convincing the upstream data source to not use json.
Putting that frustration on jq seems like a case of transference.
- spion 3y agoOr maybe jq does have some design flaws.
- Nullabillity 3y agoAnd now you've turned a JSON traversal problem into a parsing problem.. congratulations?