7 ms·
Seems like the good old false Marxist argument, in a sexy new "mathematical" package to appeal to a geeky crowd. I predict it will do extremely well here.
by NeverFade 3y ago
Seems like the good old false Marxist argument, in a sexy new "mathematical" package to appeal to a geeky crowd. I predict it will do extremely well here.
- throwawayqqq11 3y agoYou mean the utterly wrong marxist "accumulation of capital" claim? So ridiculous! There is no $problem in our civilization and it certainly isnt made by our economy or ignorance.
- Kratacoa 3y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_theory_of_value#Criticism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_theory_of_value#Criticis...
- throwawayqqq11 3y agoCould you instead show me some value which was not produced by labour please?
- amanaplanacanal 3y agoAren’t there always three pieces though? There is 1. Coming up with an idea, 2. Organizing the capital and labor to realize the idea, and 3. The labor to build the thing. Sometimes, that is all one person, but all three pieces are necessary.
- Kratacoa 3y agoThis question seems to misunderstand the topic. The assumption here is not that there is no labor involves, but rather that it its amount is not what determines the value of something it's been put towards.
- throwawayqqq11 3y agoYou misunderstood my answer. I wanted to show that labour is the foundation of all value. Weather this labour gets payed equally to the trade value is a follow up question, not tackled by your wikipedia link either but very important to discuss accumulation of capital. And i was really interested in finding some value independent from labour. Let me try again: Accumulation of capital?
- consilient 3y agoIt has nothing to do with Marxism, it's just hyped-up mutual insurance.