5 ms·
pfft... like I said "What is this 'Women:' bit about?" I didn't realise that they had listed women explicity as a perk. I just thought it was a bad bit of copy
by VonLipwig 15y ago
pfft... like I said "What is this 'Women:' bit about?"
I didn't realise that they had listed women explicity as a perk. I just thought it was a bad bit of copy. I didn't see their original site and as it has now been taken down.
I thought they had listed it in a less obvious way noting the servers would be women to bait males to attend.
Perhaps this is a bit more than a kerfuffle then.
While what they wrote turned out to be sexist I don't think at all this was there intention. They fell into the trap of sterotyping their audience. If your a hacker your probably a pale introvert with little access to women. The trouble is a hacker/programmer/whatever is just a job title. The people who do these jobs have variety personalities and genitals.
If anything they misunderstood their audience which is a shame really and managed to generate some copy that could offend just about everyone.
- thejefflarson 15y agoAre you serious? "Generate some copy?" Copy doesn't just appear out of nowhere. Someone wrote that, and meant to write that, you're kidding yourself if you think they didn't.
- VonLipwig 15y agoI have no idea what you are on about to be honest. Surely in this context generate == produce. I don't really get how you could take what I wrote as 'these guys made content "magically appear" in their event description'.
- VonLipwig 15y agoI have no idea what you are on about to be honest. Surely in this context generate == produce. I don't really get how you could take what I wrote as 'these guys made content "magically appear" in their event description'.