14 ms·
Pretty sure they're just replying specifically to > you still have guilty parties going free anyways since the wrong person is convicted which is a non sequit
by Kwantuum 3y ago
Pretty sure they're just replying specifically to
> you still have guilty parties going free anyways since the wrong person is convicted
which is a non sequitur.
- giantg2 3y agoHow exactly is that a non sequitur? It should be evident that if you jail the innocent party, the guilty party would still be at large, case closed, authorities would no longer be looking for them. The whole premise of this one or the other thing is flawed. You can increase conviction of the guilty while also protecting the innocent depending on the procedures taken. The "how" matters at lot. So when you ask people stuff like how many guilty men should go free, it's a complete farce that is easily manipulated based on how you pose the question, methods, and outcomes in the fictional scenario. It takes away focus from the actual policies/solutions. Edit: why disagree?