6 ms·

I did some geekbench tests. 4 GB, 3 CPU AMD [1] 8 GB, 4 CPU AMD [2] 8 GB, 2 CPU (dedicated) AMD [3] So even though the dedicated CPU option has stable perfo

by gerwim 3y ago

I did some geekbench tests. 4 GB, 3 CPU AMD [1] 8 GB, 4 CPU AMD [2] 8 GB, 2 CPU (dedicated) AMD [3] So even though the dedicated CPU option has stable performance, the shared CPU is almost 4x as fast. Sure, the shared results would fluctuate but given they are similar priced. Or maybe I was just lucky and got on an empty node. [1]: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2360706 https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2360706 [2]: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2360698 https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2360698 [3]: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2360730 https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/2360730

re-thc 3y ago
> So even though the dedicated CPU option has stable performance, the shared CPU is almost 4x as fast The difference between Rome and Milan is rather minor, but if you do get genoa on dedicated it's like a 50% difference, which would turn the tide somewhat.