23 ms·
Completely unrelated I'm sure: “mRNA-1273 booster vaccination-associated elevation of markers of myocardial injury occurred in about one out of 35 persons (2.8
by kiltedpanda 3y ago
Completely unrelated I'm sure:
“mRNA-1273 booster vaccination-associated elevation of markers of myocardial injury occurred in about one out of 35 persons (2.8%)"
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ejhf.2978 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ejhf.2978
- benzible 3y agoOverwhelmingly likely to be unrelated: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/the-real-risk-of-heart-inflammation-to-kids-is-from-covid-19not-the-vaccine https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/the-real-... (https://archive.li/0QXCj https://archive.li/0QXCj) ...and, from the study you link to: > mRNA-1273 vaccine-associated myocardial injury was more common than previously thought, being mild and transient, and more frequent in women versus men. "Mild and transient" does not describe a heart attack.
- kiltedpanda 3y agoIt's an interesting phenomena to watch some folks go from 'it stays in your upper arm and tells you body how to fight covid', to 'elevation of markers of myocardial injury occurred in about one out of 35 persons" is completely fine. Obviously any form of heart damage increases the chances of heart attacks in the future. The heart is extremely poor at repairing itself.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- vpribish 3y ago[flagged]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]