6 ms·

Maybe, since he was willing to name his employers, who happen to be despised in liberal circles. OTOH, there is a lot of PR spending on social media (e.g.: htt

Maybe, since he was willing to name his employers, who happen to be despised in liberal circles. OTOH, there is a lot of PR spending on social media (e.g.: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/08/us/politics/obama-campaigns-vast-effort-to-re-enlist-08-supporters.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/08/us/politics/obama-campaign...), so it wouldn't surprise me if Goldman has hired people to smear Smith on forums like this one.

leot 15y ago
Can you imagine yourself paying someone to smear others on a forum? What if you really believed in your own cause? What if it cost you a trivial proportion of your buckets of money, and if you had legions of lawyers able to write terrifying NDAs? What if you had a history of being unscrupulous in countless other contexts? What if all it took to "solve the problem" were a few choice words said to the right person? This kind of smearing is almost certainly happening all over the place because there is tons of motive, tons of opportunity, and many people with a habit of being unscrupulous.
- create_account 15y ago
  Can you imagine yourself paying someone to smear others on a forum? I cannot, no. But a large (and dare I say ruthless) organization interested in limiting the PR damage? Sure.
twoodfin 15y ago
Except it takes about 10 seconds to click over to byrneseyeview's profile and see that he's been on hn for years and is obviously not a shill. It reflects poorly on you that you'd rather accuse someone of being dishonest than take a little effort to check your paranoia.
- create_account 15y ago
  He's been on here for years, and so have I. I have often wondered, though, about his alacrity to side with the establishment, in defense of investment bankers, against net neutrality, etc., and what his motivation is.
  - philwelch 15y ago
    It reflects poorly on you that you can't conceive of someone widely disagreeing with you in good faith.

leot 15y ago

Can you imagine yourself paying someone to smear others on a forum? What if you really believed in your own cause? What if it cost you a trivial proportion of your buckets of money, and if you had legions of lawyers able to write terrifying NDAs? What if you had a history of being unscrupulous in countless other contexts? What if all it took to "solve the problem" were a few choice words said to the right person? This kind of smearing is almost certainly happening all over the place because there is tons of motive, tons of opportunity, and many people with a habit of being unscrupulous.

create_account 15y ago
Can you imagine yourself paying someone to smear others on a forum? I cannot, no. But a large (and dare I say ruthless) organization interested in limiting the PR damage? Sure.

twoodfin 15y ago

Except it takes about 10 seconds to click over to byrneseyeview's profile and see that he's been on hn for years and is obviously not a shill. It reflects poorly on you that you'd rather accuse someone of being dishonest than take a little effort to check your paranoia.

create_account 15y ago
He's been on here for years, and so have I. I have often wondered, though, about his alacrity to side with the establishment, in defense of investment bankers, against net neutrality, etc., and what his motivation is.
- philwelch 15y ago
  It reflects poorly on you that you can't conceive of someone widely disagreeing with you in good faith.