4 ms·
It was on completely ideological grounds that we differed. (Which is also against the HN rules to argue about.) I was attracted to the industry effectively to
by comfypotato 3y ago
It was on completely ideological grounds that we differed. (Which is also against the HN rules to argue about.)
I was attracted to the industry effectively to verify authentication through device fingerprinting. Others, en masse, are drawn because they don’t like the current privacy situation. Can you imagine someone being attracted to marine biology that didn’t like fish?
It’s perfectly reasonable to say that, yes, I disagree with the majority of the field. In this instance, “I don’t like fish.”
- DANmode 3y agoYou're also claiming that fish aren't at risk from the fisheries, which is super unusual for someone claiming to speak from within the industry!
- comfypotato 3y agoWell, that’s how the other side feels, yes. The closest thing this entire thread has given as evidence of overfishing is that a journalist was killed for meddling in government affairs, which has nothing to do with overfishing.