6 ms·

this doesn't even make sense

• optimalsolver 3y ago
  What's confusing you?
  • hcks 3y ago
    It’s cringe, dude.
    • optimalsolver 3y ago
      Dude, you're now in the LK-99 Age. Learn to live with it.
  • yellowcake0 3y ago
    it's not confusing, it's just silly, the Iron Age ended over 2000 years ago, so there were just no ages between the birth of Christ and LK-99?
    • optimalsolver 3y ago
      None which are generally accepted by historians that happen to be named after a single substance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-age_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-age_system
      • yellowcake0 3y ago
        That's only for prehistory. In any case it's a pretty silly contrivance, how about the oil age? or the silicon age? Both of those are likely to remain more impactful than the LK-99 age, in the event that it does turn out to be an ambient temp/pressure superconductor.
        • optimalsolver 3y ago
          If replicated, those are gonna be footnotes to LK-99 and its likely many derivatives and close cousins.
      • deleted 3y ago
        [deleted]