8 ms·
The idea if you want to sell clients, you need to get a permission form our association.
by pronkin 3y ago
The idea if you want to sell clients, you need to get a permission form our association.
- Zambyte 3y agoWhy not use the GPL?
- pronkin 3y agoBecause we want to provide other organizations with the opportunity to offer paid sync services, we needed to incorporate the concept of a network into the license. We crafted the license with that consideration in mind
- Zambyte 3y ago> Because we want to provide other organizations with the opportunity to offer paid sync services Why do you think the GPL is not compatible with this?
- mbreese 3y agoExactly… Plus, they can always offer other licenses in addition to the GPL (or really AGPL would be a better fit for their concerns). It’s their software, so they can license it to anyone with whatever terms they want. (Assuming there aren’t outside contributions, but even that can be dealt with)
- Zambyte 3y ago> Plus, they can always offer other licenses in addition to the GPL Yep, that's exactly what I was thinking. They're clearly offering alternative licenses to the one in the public repository. There is no reason the same tactic couldn't be applied with the GPL.
- maxloh 3y agoYou may employed a wrong strategy. To prevent paid sync services, you should license your protocols and data formats in AGPL, which requires derivative work (third-party sync services) to be open sourced. The client app in contrast, should be fine even in permissive licenses.