8 ms·
Because it was Russian for almost 200 years But in name only, you meant to say. Because it was populated by a very solid majority of Crimean Tatars (and very
by lisasays 3y ago
Because it was Russian for almost 200 years
But in name only, you meant to say.
Because it was populated by a very solid majority of Crimean Tatars (and very few Russians) up until 1860 or so, you mean to say. That is, until shortly after the end of that war that didn't work out so well for Russia.
And then by a solid majority of non-Russians -- mostly Crimean Tatars, along with a whole host of other folks, (including Germans, Jews, Greeks, Armenians, Bulgarians, Poles - and of course, Ukrainians) until the summer of 1944, you meant to say.
At which time a magical event happened which would finally give the peninsula a majority Russian population.
Perhaps you would like to tell us what that event was?
The Ukraine lost any moral right to govern Crimea after cutting water and electricity supply to the citizens of the peninsula.
The moment the mafia-like entities which run the Peninsula decided to throw their lot with a foreign power that was, at that time, conducting a war of aggression against Ukraine in its eastern regions -- they naturally lost any right to the benefits of the North Crimean Canal.
- gdy 3y ago"But in name only" By the same logic, Crimea could never be Ukrainian more than 'by the name only'. [0] "a magical event happened which would finally give the peninsula a majority Russian population" There's nothing magical in Stalin's crimes which were condemned in the USSR and later in Russia many times. "The moment the mafia-like entities ... they naturally lost any right to the benefits of the North Crimean Canal" So you are justifying cutting water and electricity to the whole civilian population of Crimea by Russian support for pro-Russia separatists elsewhere? That's exactly what I was talking about when I said that the Ukraine lost any moral right to govern Crimea. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Crimea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Crimea
- chaimanmeow 3y agoSince the Kiev regime (whose SBU is tightly interconnected with the Azov nationalists) directly funds and provides with weaponry such as 152/155mm artillery and shells (including cluster munitions) to their organized right wing nationalist groups who persistently conduct warcrime after warcrime for the regime, they lost any legitimate claim to the Donbass. The Azovs have shelled civilans in Dontesk for now nearly a decade and on a daily to weekly basis. Imagine if China funded and armed right wing nationalist groups, who build forts on artificial islands near Taiwan and shelled Taipei weekly for nine years straight to "punish" seperatist citizens of the Repubic of China. If that happened, you can be pretty sure China would loose any legitimate claim to Taiwan that it once had.
- axus 3y agoWow it's been 45 years since they stopped shelling Taiwan, you're kind of bringing up old history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Taiwan_Strait_Crisis#Intermittently_shelling_until_1979 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Taiwan_Strait_Crisis#In...