> some reviewers have the need to demonstrate their superior intellect/knowledge/whatever by insisting on minutia. > Few senior engineers are humble, and consi

> some reviewers have the need to demonstrate their superior intellect/knowledge/whatever by insisting on minutia. > Few senior engineers are humble, and consider code reviews as a collaborative effort to deliver the best possible solution. The difference between these two only that in first case author didn't agree with reviewer and agreed in the second. The really worst type of review that approve without looking or IDC.