7 ms·
So basically their "open source" offering wasn't really open source, it wasn't even open core, as you had to build it yourself, the build wasn't working for a l
by CAP_NET_ADMIN 3y ago
So basically their "open source" offering wasn't really open source, it wasn't even open core, as you had to build it yourself, the build wasn't working for a long time and even if you managed that, some languages were enterprise-only.
Nice. How to get free marketing by strapping Open Source to your product and writing a bunch of announcements.
- ghaff 3y agoI’ve had a few consulting calls with companies where they (or their VCs) want to call their software open source but have no interest in community development and want to block competitors from taking any advantage of it.
- CAP_NET_ADMIN 3y agoI remember looking for Sourcegraph submissions on HN, their CEO's (sqs) first submission to HN was titled "Which Open Source License Should Your Project Use If You Want to Raise VC$?"
- indus 3y agoQED.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]