4 ms·
It raises the cost for any spammer, including determined actors. More code, more complexity, plus the cost to actually rent the numbers. A lot of tech bros nee
by irl_chad 3y ago
It raises the cost for any spammer, including determined actors. More code, more complexity, plus the cost to actually rent the numbers.
A lot of tech bros need to touch grass and realize that the rest of the world doesn’t mind giving their phone number to a chat app.
- KomoD 3y ago> More code, more complexity, plus the cost to actually rent the numbers Not a big deal, there's sms verification services, they have APIs and premade libraries, cost is about ~$0.06/verification depending on which service you use, and less with bulk discounts.
- MagicMoonlight 3y agoAnd spoiler: you can’t use those for spam.
- KomoD 3y agoHuh?
- nicce 3y agoThere is a ToS in these services as well. And you can't use many from those services to actually register an account for a meaningful service. E.g. have you created Instagram account with them? Seems like there is a determined will to blacklist as many as possible.
- KomoD 3y agoNo there is not. 5sim.net, sms-activate.org, smspva.com, I'm talking about these, they're specifically made for that purpose, you can pick a country and a service
- derefr 3y agoI believe you're thinking phone numbers from legitimate VoIP services like Twilio, or the "texting app" service-providers that build on top of them. The GP is talking more about phone numbers from purpose-built (usually Russian) "secondary market for other people's credentials" marketplaces, where people sell the use of their own personal phone numbers (usually through cloud remote-control software they run on an old Android device with the SIM in it.)
- herbst 3y agoIt starts from 4 cents per number. If my bot isn't going to make that 4 cent within its first few hours I am in the wrong business.
- happymellon 3y agoThere are scenarios, such as communicating with my children, where someone doesn't have a phone number. Hangouts worked great until Google got bored and trashed it with Duo/whatever the other one was, that's all I was saying.
- blitzar 3y agoGoogle talk worked great until Google got bored and trashed it with Hangouts which worked less great until Google got bored and trashed it with Duo. The sad part of it all ... Google Talk - by orders of magnitude their best chat offering was just xmpp/jabber the whole time.
- shortcake27 3y agoPeople shouldn’t be expected to give up their privacy and anonymity and put themselves at greater risk of identity theft because big tech can’t be bothered figuring out a different way to solve spam. Just because the rest of the world doesn’t mind giving out their phone number, it doesn’t mean it’s harmless. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to get sim swapped and have all of my bank accounts drained because some random company with zero security measures demands I provide my phone number to use their app.
- shitpostbot 3y ago[dead]
- viraptor 3y agoI think you're misplacing your annoyance here. A lot of the world is not constantly affected by Sim swapping. Your phone number is not a secret either. The problem is the minimal verification that allows sim swapping to exist in the first place.
- FormerBandmate 3y agoUnless you have beef with a state sponsored actor, you’re safe with Signal. Possibly even then If you have beef with a state sponsored actor I’m not really sure what you’re doing on HN. The Taliban uses WhatsApp lmao
- derefr 3y agoThese companies don't expect you to give up privacy and anonymity. They expect you to pay $1 to rent a phone number. To these companies, a phone number is an externalized reusable proof-of-stake in the PSTN NFT market — nothing more, nothing less.