10 ms·
> Well, here we are in Australia, 115+ years on and this is still yet to happen. Didn't you guys recently have COVID concentration camps? You might wanna rethi
by sennight 3y ago
> Well, here we are in Australia, 115+ years on and this is still yet to happen.
Didn't you guys recently have COVID concentration camps? You might wanna rethink that position.
> Any ideas on when your predicted outcomes will kick in?
Ask Klaus Schwab, he and Bill Gates seem to have their fingers on the pulse of awful things going down in the world.
- t-writescode 3y ago> Didn't you guys recently have COVID concentration camps? You might wanna rethink that position. True or not, what does that have to do with literally anything that's been said?
- sennight 3y agoSpoiler alert, true. >>> ...shift the consensus position for an acceptable standard of living... >> Well, here we are in Australia, 115+ years on and this is still yet to happen. > ...recently have COVID concentration camps? I pointed to a shifting consensus position, he denied it, I pointed to an outrageous example of the warping of normalcy in his own backyard. That clear it up for you?
- defrost 3y ago> he denied it Who denied what now? Can you quote the denial, I'm not seeing it.
- sennight 3y ago"Well, here we are in Australia, 115+ years on and this is still yet to happen. Any ideas on when your predicted outcomes will kick in?"
- defrost 3y agoAnd the question stands. If a minimum living wage leads to economic collapse .. when will that happen (given that's not yet happened after 115+ years in practice)?
- sennight 3y agoAnd the answer remains the same: a redefinition of what constitutes the standard of living is far more likely than "economic collapse"... it is already happening.