5 ms·
Super interesting, I didn't know it was a reaction. Looking at Usenet thread screenshots, I think the UX issue with their threads is that they actually listed
by tquinn 3y ago
Super interesting, I didn't know it was a reaction. Looking at Usenet thread screenshots, I think the UX issue with their threads is that they actually listed the title, not the actual message in a branch format. Whereas Reddit has the actual message content in a branch format.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversation_threading#/media/File:Nntp.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversation_threading#/media/...
VS
https://preview.redd.it/r7k2gf1kav6z.png?auto=webp&s=9fd7a0bf3ccc158399cb499f85881ed77348d18e https://preview.redd.it/r7k2gf1kav6z.png?auto=webp&s=9fd7a0b...
I think the flat sequential thread works fine with a limited number of messages.
Eventually with enough replies it degrades to being very unwieldy like traditional forums.
- iso1631 3y agoI'm sure slashdot showed the messages in threads (at least in some modes) at least 5 years before reddit was a thing. In fact here's a screenshot from 2005 https://www.flickr.com/photos/third/18260796 https://www.flickr.com/photos/third/18260796