6 ms·
Faster than axum? Nice!
by idiomaticrust 3y ago
Faster than axum? Nice!
- dralley 3y agoKeep in mind that microbenchmarks aren't necessarily representative of production performance. * Some webservers "cheat" and skip a lot of request headers which one may want to use in a production scenario to get better numbers. * Some web server architectures can do very well on many small uniformly sized requests but poorly on a mixture of request sizes. * Some web server architectures can get very good average latency but poor p99 latency. * Some benchmarking tools don't measure correctly: https://medium.com/@siddontang/the-coordinated-omission-problem-in-the-benchmark-tools-5d9abef79279 https://medium.com/@siddontang/the-coordinated-omission-prob... etc.
- giovannibonetti 3y agoThe benchmarks only include throughput, not latency (P50, P95, P99), which are quite important.