6 ms·
I was not a fan of the old icon[1], but the new one isn't better. Way too much detail on the new icon at smaller sizes. [1]:http://static.tumultco.com/press/me
by mutewinter 15y ago
I was not a fan of the old icon[1], but the new one isn't better. Way too much detail on the new icon at smaller sizes.
[1]:http://static.tumultco.com/press/media/HypeIconShadow.png http://static.tumultco.com/press/media/HypeIconShadow.png
- tumultco 15y agoWe do have separate variants for 32x32 and 16x16 sizes, which are visible when scaling in the Finder.
- ugh 15y agoBullshit. http://i.imgur.com/Nw5gv.png http://i.imgur.com/Nw5gv.png That’s how much detail OS X icons are supposed to have. (Have you looked at the apps that come with the OS?!) Smaller versions with less detail are used for smaller sizes. I wish more app developers would actually have such awesome icons. But HN has to complain. Of course.
- tumultco 15y agoThanks for illustrating how we scale with the screenshot! :)