6 ms·
Haven't had trouble into the low hundreds of millions on a single RDS server with 16GB of ram. YMMV.
by totalhack 3y ago
Haven't had trouble into the low hundreds of millions on a single RDS server with 16GB of ram. YMMV.
- candiddevmike 3y agoIs that web scale?
- bombcar 3y agoYou run MongoDB as a backing store. Very web much scale.
- arthurcolle 3y agoLiterally pays for itself in scale
- weard_beard 3y agoAnyone who wants to get these references: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs
- arthurcolle 3y ago"Does /dev/null support sharding?" - literally dying over here, so good
- arthurcolle 3y agoThis is Google: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3t6L-FlfeaI&t=12s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3t6L-FlfeaI&t=12s I don't even know how to count that low
- TylerE 3y agoSomeone needs to remake this, just global search and replace “web scale” with “blockchain”.
- devoutsalsa 3y agoI prefer/dev/null for write heavy workloads that need long term storage. There’s plenty of data in modern physics to suggest that there’s no information loss from going into a black hole, so there shouldn’t be any problems. Put “architected web scale data singularity with bulletproof disaster recovery plan” in your CV. You don’t need to mention the recovery plan is to interview for new jobs when someone starts asking to access the data.
- rakejake 3y agoHaha. Good one.
- brootstrap 3y agosame. we've got 3 to 4 hundred million rows in one table and our queries still complete in the 100ms range!
- noduerme 3y agoAny partitioning?
- halper 3y agoWe had about half a billion rows in one table back in 2008, and doing thousands of updates/inserts/deletes per second. Can't remember how much RAN we had, but we sure did have a few spinning disks.