5 ms·
This by the same team who brought you the DORA metrics and the SPACE framework. I suspect it is really a vehicle to sell books and consulting, despite the artic
by Throw10987 3y ago
This by the same team who brought you the DORA metrics and the SPACE framework. I suspect it is really a vehicle to sell books and consulting, despite the article largely making sense.
Maybe it is atonement of some sort.
- lucasfcosta 3y agoThanks for pointing that out. Although I do think DORA metrics make some sense, it seems like an unnecessary framework considering what the folks in queueing theory have done over the years. Anyone claiming we need to invent our own metrics needs to read Reinertsen.
- kqr 3y agoI'm sure you have seen it already, but there has been some sound criticism of the DORA metrics: https://isthisit.nz/posts/2022/state-of-the-dora-devops-metrics/ https://isthisit.nz/posts/2022/state-of-the-dora-devops-metr... Though I disagree with Logan about the change failure rate (see https://two-wrongs.com/you-can-reliably-measure-change-failure-rate.html https://two-wrongs.com/you-can-reliably-measure-change-failu...), I still think he is spot on in terms of MTTR. Strongly seconding Reinertsen for anyone interested in this, though. I think this article of yours is particularly insightful and of high quality: https://lucasfcosta.com/2022/08/31/engineering-metrics.html https://lucasfcosta.com/2022/08/31/engineering-metrics.html