6 ms·
It's not a "sustainability tax", it's "acknowledging people are not slaves nor are resources infinite"
by ealhad 3y ago
It's not a "sustainability tax", it's "acknowledging people are not slaves nor are resources infinite"
- willcipriano 3y ago"Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent” It may not make sense to repair for many consumers. In a few years we might have better codecs or similar and you'll want to upgrade your crusty headphones anyway.
- rstat1 3y ago>>In a few years we might have better codecs This sounds like something could be done with a firmware update.
- ealhad 3y agoOr the speakers themselves, eventually
- lozenge 3y agoNope, for latency and battery reasons this would be done by a specific chip, e.g. https://www.icstation.com/audio-module-bluetooth-compatible-receiver-universal-audio-module-p-12506.html https://www.icstation.com/audio-module-bluetooth-compatible-... / https://www.tinyosshop.com/ts8670 https://www.tinyosshop.com/ts8670 The same's true on the smartphone transmitter side.
- rstat1 3y agoThat 2nd link you shared, has 3 links under "Documentation" to firmware downloads.
- roughly 3y ago> "Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent” I notice every time the cost of a properly sustainable product comes up, the conversation always turns to what a short-sighted bastard everyone else is, and I can only assume the people who make that argument are already making moral choices themselves, which is honestly just heartwarming to see.