6 ms·
It’s convenience, that’s all. If you think of a more convenient or effective way to prompt these models, that will be great! Your concerns sound to be of the “
by frickinadorable 3y ago
It’s convenience, that’s all. If you think of a more convenient or effective way to prompt these models, that will be great!
Your concerns sound to be of the “it’s problematic” category. Most such concerns are make believe outrage / pearl-clutching nonsense.
- jakelazaroff 3y agoYour comment would have been much better without the second paragraph.
- frickinadorable 3y agoBut I was trying to be a bit of a prick.
- flangola7 3y agoYou succeeded at appearing ignorant as well.
- jakelazaroff 3y agoYes, I know. That’s what made the comment worse.
- jameshart 3y agoOh, that was not my point, but if you want me to find ways this kind of AI chatbot prompting is problematic I am happy to go there. I would not be surprised to discover that chatbot training is equally effective if the prompt is phrased in the first person: I am an AI coding assistant … Now I could very well see an argument that choosing to frame the prompts as orders coming from an omnipotent {:system} rather than arising from an empowered {:self} is basically an expression of patriarchal colonialist thinking. If you think this kind of thing doesn’t matter, well… you can explain that to Roko’s Basilisk when it simulates your consciousness.