5 ms·
I read articles quite regularly. They are almost always heavily partisan, spuriously sourced and have been on the wrong side of major stories for years
by throwaway202303 3y ago
I read articles quite regularly. They are almost always heavily partisan, spuriously sourced and have been on the wrong side of major stories for years
- Capricorn2481 3y agoLet's hear that awesome, alternative, unbiased news source
- netbioserror 3y agoThere's no need, criticism of one thing does not require endorsement of an alternative. The Guardian deserves every rotten fruit and compressed fecal mass thrown at it.
- throwaway2037 3y agoI'm confused. (1) You read it regularly. (2) Then you say: "heavily partisan, spuriously sourced and have been on the wrong side of major stories for years". It seems strange to read a newspaper regularly that is so bad. What do you recommend instead?
- I_complete_me 3y agoFor a second there I thought it was throwaway responding to his own comment. I loved him for one second!
- gumballindie 3y agoI regularly read both sides of a story to avoid getting polarised. And by doing and avg of each side’s views i might find the truth. But the guardian has a heavy fetish for poverty porn and stereotyping making it difficult to digest. A bit like the dailymail but with less useful content and more racial tension.