5 ms·

On the home page, "For more detailed information take a look at the specification." links to https://www.domainverification.org/spec https://www.domainverificat

On the home page, "For more detailed information take a look at the specification." links to https://www.domainverification.org/spec https://www.domainverification.org/spec which is a 404. `dig 4i7ozur385y5nsqoo0mg0mxv6t9333s2rarxrtvlpag1gsk8pg._dv.dvexample.com TXT` returns: ;; ANSWER SECTION: 4i7ozur385y5nsqoo0mg0mxv6t9333s2rarxrtvlpag1gsk8pg._dv.dvexample.com. 0 IN TXT "@dv=1;d=Example user emali;e=2025-01-01;s=[seo;email;marketing;storage;security];p=[serviceprovider1.com];sn=[service.serviceprovider.com];h=4i7ozur385y5nsqoo0mg0mxv6t9333s2rarxrtvlpag1gsk8pg" There's a typo in "Example user emali". These simple mistakes don't engender confidence in the proposal.

elliottinvent 3y ago
Huge thanks for pointing these out. I moved the spec to /docs/spec very recently and forgot to update that link on homepage – fixed now. "Emali" is a new typo for me, will fix that in the DNS record, thanks.
susadmin 3y ago
How do syntax errors dissuade you from the proposal? Is not design separate from implementation? Is it not true that a well-designed specification, proposal, etc. can be poorly implemented?
- hiatus 3y ago
  If you got a job offer that was riddled with spelling mistakes and had the wrong name, would that inspire confidence in your future place of work? It's not a huge stretch of the imagination that small, obvious issues could mean larger, more complex issues lurking.
  - elliottinvent 3y ago
    I'd say "riddled with spelling mistakes" is a bit strong in our example (I realise you weren't claiming that about the site). I got it out early to get some feedback. The 404 spec link is a bad one (since fixed) but the typo in the DNS record is forgivable I think – very impressed anyone spotted that.
    - hiatus 3y ago
      To be clear, my comment was directly addressing my parent's comment of > How do syntax errors dissuade you from the proposal? Is not design separate from implementation? I would not characterize your content as "riddled with spelling mistakes" and apologize if you read if that way.

elliottinvent 3y ago

Huge thanks for pointing these out. I moved the spec to /docs/spec very recently and forgot to update that link on homepage – fixed now. "Emali" is a new typo for me, will fix that in the DNS record, thanks.

susadmin 3y ago

How do syntax errors dissuade you from the proposal? Is not design separate from implementation? Is it not true that a well-designed specification, proposal, etc. can be poorly implemented?

hiatus 3y ago
If you got a job offer that was riddled with spelling mistakes and had the wrong name, would that inspire confidence in your future place of work? It's not a huge stretch of the imagination that small, obvious issues could mean larger, more complex issues lurking.
- elliottinvent 3y ago
  I'd say "riddled with spelling mistakes" is a bit strong in our example (I realise you weren't claiming that about the site). I got it out early to get some feedback. The 404 spec link is a bad one (since fixed) but the typo in the DNS record is forgivable I think – very impressed anyone spotted that.
  - hiatus 3y ago
    To be clear, my comment was directly addressing my parent's comment of > How do syntax errors dissuade you from the proposal? Is not design separate from implementation? I would not characterize your content as "riddled with spelling mistakes" and apologize if you read if that way.