6 ms·
They both have highly imperfect avenues with which we can exert influence, but one has more power to compel you to support them legally “or else”.
by kiawe_fire 3y ago
They both have highly imperfect avenues with which we can exert influence, but one has more power to compel you to support them legally “or else”.
- JohnFen 3y ago> one has more power to compel you to support them legally “or else”. I think that they both have approximately equal power to do that.
- anigbrowl 3y agoThat same one also has far more mechanisms and legal avenues for accountability, vs the other that tries to shuffle people off into arbitration and the like, while at the same time spending money to lobby against legislation that might impact its business model.