5 ms·

I think you have to define quality. If you define quality as the absence of annoyances I think you're probably over optimizing the wrong thing. You want to prov

I think you have to define quality. If you define quality as the absence of annoyances I think you're probably over optimizing the wrong thing. You want to provide a clear, fast path for users to solve their problems and at scale you have to prioritize providing paths to solving big problems for users rather than fixing the volume of small annoyances, it's incredibly more impactful.

JohnFen 3y ago
From a business point of view, this depends on your competition. If there's a competing product that solves problems as well as yours, having fewer warts is a powerful competitive advantage. From a craft point of view, they all matter a lot. We all want to make products that are actually good on every level, right? But, as you say, you can't optimize for everything.