>what additional value would a tenant have in a landlord who passes these "invasive background checks"? the question is more what disincentive would a prospect

>what additional value would a tenant have in a landlord who passes these "invasive background checks"? the question is more what disincentive would a prospective tenant have leading them to not sign up with a landlord who fails the background check. I also can't imagine there would be a system where the landlord is required to sign up.