6 ms·

"I am not against nuclear power" - this is litterally the calling card of a tactical hit, forum-wise. It very obviously means the opposite of what it says. I g

"I am not against nuclear power" - this is litterally the calling card of a tactical hit, forum-wise. It very obviously means the opposite of what it says. I generally look at how people perceive things like this as an IQ test. At the moment the HN visitors upvoting/downvoting things in this thread have failed my baseline IQ test. How I wish all presumably well-intentioned but badly informed and ill-educated people who very often seem to have.. let's say, bad luck when thinking would just stop trying to spread their gospel via forums in this destructive way. Looking at you, vaguely-informed "friends of the planet".

eric-burel 3y ago
:( no really I try to stay open-minded and found contradictory answers interesting, if only because they are well documented. My reply is also to the initial article, which is on the contrary way too optimistic. Nuclear energy is not black or white, I think sharing personal experience as someone living near a plant, in a country relying mostly on nuclear energy, is relevant.
- throw-4e451c8 3y ago
  Oh no! "as someone living near a plant" My first 18 years: I lived 45 km from a nuclear power plant. It helped me getting interested in physics because of some in hindsight exceptionally well performed guest lectures from a physicist working there, in grades 7-8.
- q1w2 3y ago
  You misrepresent tritium coming from a plant as a "radioactive leak". That's just dishonest nonsense.
  - throw-4e451c8 3y ago
    Please remember; Eric is very open to both the positives and the negatives. But do keep in mind the negatives. Also, did you know that french nuclear power plants sometimes are taken down for maintenance. That seems super sketchy, doesn't it? /s This f*****g thread.
7952 3y ago
It is difficult to be well informed about these issues. Even without nuclear you need to think about the grid, environmental impact, economics, supply chains, financing. And nuclear adds complex science and engineering that would take several lifetimes to learn. People want to reduce the problem to one or two easily understood dimensions. We are all insufficently educated.

eric-burel 3y ago

:( no really I try to stay open-minded and found contradictory answers interesting, if only because they are well documented. My reply is also to the initial article, which is on the contrary way too optimistic. Nuclear energy is not black or white, I think sharing personal experience as someone living near a plant, in a country relying mostly on nuclear energy, is relevant.

throw-4e451c8 3y ago
Oh no! "as someone living near a plant" My first 18 years: I lived 45 km from a nuclear power plant. It helped me getting interested in physics because of some in hindsight exceptionally well performed guest lectures from a physicist working there, in grades 7-8.
q1w2 3y ago
You misrepresent tritium coming from a plant as a "radioactive leak". That's just dishonest nonsense.
- throw-4e451c8 3y ago
  Please remember; Eric is very open to both the positives and the negatives. But do keep in mind the negatives. Also, did you know that french nuclear power plants sometimes are taken down for maintenance. That seems super sketchy, doesn't it? /s This f*****g thread.

7952 3y ago

It is difficult to be well informed about these issues. Even without nuclear you need to think about the grid, environmental impact, economics, supply chains, financing. And nuclear adds complex science and engineering that would take several lifetimes to learn. People want to reduce the problem to one or two easily understood dimensions. We are all insufficently educated.