6 ms·
My jet engine is unique. There are actually many no-moving-parts jets. Each with different drawbacks. A ramjet cannot start from a static position, mine can sta
by imperator 15y ago
My jet engine is unique. There are actually many no-moving-parts jets. Each with different drawbacks. A ramjet cannot start from a static position, mine can start from a static position.
If anyone is interested, there are some very cool no-moving-parts jets that aren't as well known as ramjets:
The lockwood hiller pulsejet is a pulsejet that doesn't need reed valves.
http://aardvark.co.nz/pjet/valveless.htm http://aardvark.co.nz/pjet/valveless.htm
The Gluhareff Pressure jet is also a neat example.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluhareff_Pressure_Jet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluhareff_Pressure_Jet
- sbierwagen 15y agoA pulsejet based on the Tesla valve? So, like that prototype Bruce Simpson was talking about ten years ago? https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:UX5eNgncG3MJ:aardvark.co.nz/pjet/xjet.shtml+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:UX5eNg...