6 ms·
I'm old enough to remember when we were told Twitter isn't the government so this isn't a free speech issue and if people don't like it they can build their own
by yucky 3y ago
I'm old enough to remember when we were told Twitter isn't the government so this isn't a free speech issue and if people don't like it they can build their own platform and blah blah blah..
Does that still hold now?
- paulgb 3y agoYes, that still holds. Nobody is forcing Twitter to be a free speech platform. It was Elon's claim that it would become one under him, and he garnered a lot of support on the basis of that idea, only to repeatedly make fools of people who fell for it.
- papito 3y agoSo, the people who were defending Musk before now finally "see" the difference between moderation and free speech, and even point it out. So, was that "free speech absolutism" even argued in good faith, I wonder, or was it at all performative outrage at nothing, to own the libs?
- yucky 3y agoI think most people against censorship are still against it. I just find it ironic that the people who supported censorship before are now up in arms.
- dorkwood 3y agoI’d like to hear more about this kind of thing. Has Twitter censored brands like this in the past?
- _djo_ 3y agoNo. Not before Musk took over. For one, it’s the kind of thing likely to get you sued for anti-competitive practices.
- yucky 3y agoThey banned NY Post for reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop and the contents showing "10% for the big guy" in reference to his father getting kickbacks on some shady Ukrainian and Chinese deals that Hunter facilitated.
- papito 3y agoWrong. They suspended linking to the story for 24 hours - a story that had very shady sourcing and which the New York Post did not even put an author's name on.
- yucky 3y agoShady sourcing = the actual laptop and the contents which later proved to be 100% correct. Also, Zerohedge was banned for quite awhile for the same thing.
- papito 3y agoCase in point, using "moderation" and government censorship as if they were the same. This is not a good faith argument. We are "up in arms" about the hypocrisy and dishonesty, not the decision itself. It's Musk's company - no one cares. But let's not call it "moderation", ok? Taking away the NYT blue check is petty revenge, but whatever.
- yucky 3y agoTalk about a bad faith argument. Nobody took away NY Times blue check except themselves when they refused to pay for the subscription like everyone else. Just like they won't let me view their articles without a subscription, so they should understand how that works as well as anybody.
- paulddraper 3y agoOnly when it's on my team.
- ceejayoz 3y agoNo one says Musk can’t do these things. He has that right. People are pointing out he promised not to, and that that makes him an enormous hypocrite.