7 ms·
Googling the cosignatories names revelas that several work for Exxon. I don't see how the WSJ didn't consider this relevant information to disclose, instead pr
by gaurav_v 15y ago
Googling the cosignatories names revelas that several work for Exxon. I don't see how the WSJ didn't consider this relevant information to disclose, instead presenting them only as 'distinguished scientists.'
- ceejayoz 15y ago> I don't see how the WSJ didn't consider this relevant information to disclose... It's a WSJ editorial. They probably wouldn't consider it relevant info if the article writer worked for Exxon.
- glenra 15y agoIf you're going to make allegations of that sort, you should at probably list the "several" who you conclude "work for" Exxon. Better yet, link your sources.