7 ms·
>and some (a lot?) of the community/devs went to https://forgejo.org/ https://forgejo.org/ The Forjero commits prove that this is incorrect (they are still bus
by mariusmg 3y ago
>and some (a lot?) of the community/devs went to https://forgejo.org/ https://forgejo.org/
The Forjero commits prove that this is incorrect (they are still busy removing Gitea branding related things from their code). It's going to take a long time until they begin to match the Gitea momentum.
- sangnoir 3y ago> It's going to take a long time until they begin to match the Gitea momentum. I'd hope so! I am not interested in many of the features being added to Gitea (i.e. the momentum you allude to[1]). I want a light binary I can continue to self-host on a Raspberry Pi Zero that doesn't have Docker installed. 1. I feel Gitea is being positioned as a competitor to GitHub and GitLab - good for them! However, the previous iteration was close to perfect for my needs, albeit not very monetizable. I'm glad it got forked and will be side-grading to Forgejo.
- joencott 3y ago> (i.e. the momentum you allude to[1]) The momentum stalled when the community was plagued recently by toxic behaviour of one of the members who started the fork. He had to step down from the "well-being" team[1], bullied a moderation team member into stepping down[2] and forced him to disclose information from a private chat[3]. Now he is trying to "reboot" the community to erase his previous bad behaviour [4] Forgejo members are also unhappy about conflicts of interest of this individual [5] The Forgejo community is stronger than this one individual, so it will succeed. [1]: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/commit/d822fc3b90f793720232ceb3caccc4ca6483aa44 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/commit/d822fc3b90f79372023... [2]: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/176#issuecomment-821207 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/176#issuecomment-82... [3]: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/176#issuecomment-821309 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/176#issuecomment-82... [4]: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/187 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/187 [5]: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/pulls/180#issuecomment-843382 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/pulls/180#issuecomment-843...
- dave78 3y agoWow, that project looks toxic.