56 ms·
I’m skeptical. There is a lot wiggle room in “no specific training”. Could just mean the didn’t fine tune the model for any of tests. Their training data probab
by gisely 4y ago
I’m skeptical. There is a lot wiggle room in “no specific training”. Could just mean the didn’t fine tune the model for any of tests. Their training data probably included many past LSAT exams and certainly included many instances of people discussing how to solve LSAT problems.
- loandbehold 4y agoHow is it different than humans preparing for LSAT by studying sample questions and reading explanations?