First, just because most Muslims don't like being around dogs doesn't automatically indicate that there is a problem with Google's policy. People that don't li

First, just because most Muslims don't like being around dogs doesn't automatically indicate that there is a problem with Google's policy. People that don't like being around dogs will place a lower value upon working at Google. People who do like dogs will place a higher value upon working at Google. If more people like dogs than don't like dogs, Google will benefit from their policy, and those who dislike dogs will suffer for their intolerance. If the opposite is true then they will suffer from their policy and people who dislike dogs will benefit. Regardless of your policy someone is being discriminated against, so moral arguments will be irresolute. As such, economic reasoning seems as good as standard to judge by as any other. The claims of discrimination by allowing dogs in the workplace suffer from assuming that the status quo is some how more just than an alternative: don't worry, someone gets screwed no matter what.