5 ms·
The end game here is developing a mind reading device. The endeavor device is ethically questionable because such a device would have a lot of ethically wrong/q
by tiarafawn 4y ago
The end game here is developing a mind reading device. The endeavor device is ethically questionable because such a device would have a lot of ethically wrong/questionable applications.
- arbitrage 4y agoYou're begging the question.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Dylan16807 4y agoNo they're not. They're not saying "X is bad because X is bad", which would be begging the question. They're saying X is bad because it leads to Y, and Y is bad. Y being bad is supposed to be common knowledge, so they didn't go into detail.
- zepolen 4y agoThe only thing that's ethically questionable are humans themselves and such a device would likely do more to expose the unethical. Everybody remembers what happen when online dna hit mainstream.
- nhchris 4y agoI think only good thoughts so I'm not worried. Plus anyone with control of this technology is sure to have our best interests in mind.
- the_af 4y agoExactly. Think good, happy thoughts. Happiness is mandatory. Being unhappy is treason. Treason is punishable by death. Have a happy daycycle, citizen!
- Veen 4y agoYeah, that's just what we need: brain scanners purported to "expose the unethical". Nothing could go wrong with that. I find it extremely silly when people argue a technology is value neutral and humans are the problem so we shouldn't "judge" or critique the tech. Who do they think is going to use the technology?