6 ms·
I'm not sure why you're bothering replying to someone who's misgendering someone in their previous comment?
by gyaru 4y ago
I'm not sure why you're bothering replying to someone who's misgendering someone in their previous comment?
- klyrs 4y agoAs your comment-sibling suggests, it's good to at least try to assume good faith. Perhaps I wanted to give just a bit more rope for the commenter to hang theirself with. This is, perhaps, a counterintuitive argument for free speech: if you don't let them make asses of themselves in public, nobody will believe that they're doing it in private. The ad-hominem response is little more than confirmation that I hold the higher ground.
- nailer 4y agoI’m sorry what ad-hominem response? You labelled me a bigot for pointing out that gender theory harms children, which I guess you think isn’t ad hominem? I told you to stop harming children and you think that is ad hominem and proves you have the moral high ground?
- nailer 4y agoKim Petras was abused as a 12 year old boy. You're welcome to your own newspeak but the rest of us don't have to revise history because you want us to.