11 ms·

OK, what do you propose as the solution then? If you read the article none of the executives quoted directly mention how cheap Chinese labor is. They talk abou

OK, what do you propose as the solution then? If you read the article none of the executives quoted directly mention how cheap Chinese labor is. They talk about how quickly they can "scale up or down." There are only 2 countries where you can scale up your semi-skilled work force rapidly, and the other country hasn't started ramping up for manufacturing just yet. Regarding your comment about suicide, China for various reasons has a rather high suicide rate. Its not clear to me if the suicide rate amongst FoxConn workers is just a symptom of their society or something really bad about FoxConn itself.

Natsu 15y ago
> OK, what do you propose as the solution then? Keep pressure on them to improve. Not just Foxconn, which is getting singled out (and will, most likely, end up being one of the better ones due to scrutiny after this blows over), but on all of the factories until they reform. Specifically, they appear to pay no attention at all to worker safety. You'd think that after things like that horrible carcinogenic Sanlu milk, they would be more interested in things like chemical safety, but I guess they're not quite there yet. While America is by no means perfect, they should copy us and have people monitoring workplace injuries, require worker education on safety, require appropriate protective gear for anyone doing dangerous things, and hold companies responsible for the health & safety of their workforce. It's not impossible to improve. I don't expect them to be perfect, but there are plenty of things they could be doing which, according to the reports, they are not.
- beachgeek 15y ago
  When the Chinese people have had enough, they'll demand change. Who are we to force change down their throats? In 2003 our President invaded a country that had nothing to do with the war on terror. We didn't listen to anyone including our closest allies. Why would China or anyone else give a shit about what we have to say now?
  - Natsu 15y ago
    > When the Chinese people have had enough, they'll demand change. You mean like the group that threatened suicide? Or the outrage over that Sanlu milk powder? > In 2003 our President invaded a country that had nothing to do with the war on terror. I don't know why you're comparing bad PR to starting a war. You appear to have a very different idea of "pressure" than I do.
    - beachgeek 15y ago
      >> When the Chinese people have had enough, they'll demand change. > You mean like the group that threatened suicide? Or the outrage over that Sanlu milk powder? Like I said, when it gets too much, they'll demand and get change. Its not our problem. >> In 2003 our President invaded a country that had nothing to do with the war on terror. > I don't know why you're comparing bad PR to starting a war. You appear to have a very different idea of "pressure" than I do. My point is we don't have a lot of moral authority anymore. Everyone remembers that we started a war under false pretenses. And that we killed 100s of thousands of Iraqis in the process of bringing them "democracy". Our own jihad for democracy. It isn't just bad PR. You said we should "pressure" China to force their factories to provide better working conditions. Why should they? Or were you implying that we should invade China as well? Is that your idea of "pressure"?
      - Natsu 15y ago
        The "pressure" I'm talking about is the existing bad PR. That is, what's happening right now. And it is getting results, because Apple itself is auditing its suppliers. I most certainly do not advocate starting any wars. I'm not even talking about government pressure. Frankly, the economic pressure from Apple, which doesn't want to take crap for factory conditions in China, may do more good than anything the US government is likely to try.
        beachgeek 15y ago
        OK. Economic pressure is something I can agree with. If you don't like it, don't buy it. The rest of the world (and those of us who deal with it) begs you not to start any more wars.

Natsu 15y ago

> OK, what do you propose as the solution then? Keep pressure on them to improve. Not just Foxconn, which is getting singled out (and will, most likely, end up being one of the better ones due to scrutiny after this blows over), but on all of the factories until they reform. Specifically, they appear to pay no attention at all to worker safety. You'd think that after things like that horrible carcinogenic Sanlu milk, they would be more interested in things like chemical safety, but I guess they're not quite there yet. While America is by no means perfect, they should copy us and have people monitoring workplace injuries, require worker education on safety, require appropriate protective gear for anyone doing dangerous things, and hold companies responsible for the health & safety of their workforce. It's not impossible to improve. I don't expect them to be perfect, but there are plenty of things they could be doing which, according to the reports, they are not.

beachgeek 15y ago
When the Chinese people have had enough, they'll demand change. Who are we to force change down their throats? In 2003 our President invaded a country that had nothing to do with the war on terror. We didn't listen to anyone including our closest allies. Why would China or anyone else give a shit about what we have to say now?
- Natsu 15y ago
  > When the Chinese people have had enough, they'll demand change. You mean like the group that threatened suicide? Or the outrage over that Sanlu milk powder? > In 2003 our President invaded a country that had nothing to do with the war on terror. I don't know why you're comparing bad PR to starting a war. You appear to have a very different idea of "pressure" than I do.
  - beachgeek 15y ago
    >> When the Chinese people have had enough, they'll demand change. > You mean like the group that threatened suicide? Or the outrage over that Sanlu milk powder? Like I said, when it gets too much, they'll demand and get change. Its not our problem. >> In 2003 our President invaded a country that had nothing to do with the war on terror. > I don't know why you're comparing bad PR to starting a war. You appear to have a very different idea of "pressure" than I do. My point is we don't have a lot of moral authority anymore. Everyone remembers that we started a war under false pretenses. And that we killed 100s of thousands of Iraqis in the process of bringing them "democracy". Our own jihad for democracy. It isn't just bad PR. You said we should "pressure" China to force their factories to provide better working conditions. Why should they? Or were you implying that we should invade China as well? Is that your idea of "pressure"?
    - Natsu 15y ago
      The "pressure" I'm talking about is the existing bad PR. That is, what's happening right now. And it is getting results, because Apple itself is auditing its suppliers. I most certainly do not advocate starting any wars. I'm not even talking about government pressure. Frankly, the economic pressure from Apple, which doesn't want to take crap for factory conditions in China, may do more good than anything the US government is likely to try.
      - beachgeek 15y ago
        OK. Economic pressure is something I can agree with. If you don't like it, don't buy it. The rest of the world (and those of us who deal with it) begs you not to start any more wars.