7 ms·
Yes, because royalty got to its position through being a self described "empathetic person". No, power is awarded to those bold enough to do what needs to be d
by blue039 4y ago
Yes, because royalty got to its position through being a self described "empathetic person".
No, power is awarded to those bold enough to do what needs to be done. You'd be wise to read _The Prince_, and instead of being revolted by it, take it as a lesson in how people such as US presidents, CEOs, dictators, etc all come to power.
I'm getting downvoted because people like you haven't studied history. Typical of the pseudo-intellectual I doubt you've read any books on the historical acquisition of power. If you did, you'd notice the common thread across all cultures, kingdoms, and royalty. There's a distinct difference between deliberate machiavellianism, and uncontrolled machiavellianism. The former is business, the latter is "psychopathy". I put it in quotes because you also do not have any idea what psychopathy actually is. I'm sure you go around the office calling people "nazis" and "fascists" too.
- inkcapmushroom 4y agoMy guy, you are not going to become royalty no matter how much you lie to everyone in your life. There are many jerks who live in the gutters and prisons too, far more than ones who live like kings.
- Red_Leaves_Flyy 4y agoDid you pay for access to tates discord? This is the same type of demented antisocial rhetoric he uses.