5 ms·
They apparently caught him because he logged into a wiretapped gmail with a VPN. It's not difficult to segment your network such that some software does not use
by rogers18445 4y ago
They apparently caught him because he logged into a wiretapped gmail with a VPN. It's not difficult to segment your network such that some software does not use a VPN tunnel. On Linux, it can even be made fool-proof with network namespaces.
You can even render the default network namespace barren such that any accidentally launched software has no network of any kind.
- cmeacham98 4y agoI interpreted it differently - I'm assuming what "pen register" means in relation to GMail is that they get the metadata (i.e. who he is sending/receiving email from) and saw that he used his email to sign up for a VPN.
- Thorentis 4y agoIf true, is that actually a breach of bail conditions? How did they prove that he actually used the VPN rather than just, for the sake of argument, signing up to NordVPN to support his favourite YouTube creator?
- cmeacham98 4y agoIt is not a breach of bail conditions (at least not currently). The prosecution is arguing that VPN use makes SBF more of a flight risk, and is asking the court to make the bail conditions more strict because of it.
- panki27 4y agoUsing an anonymization software to access a service which directly identifies you... yeah, who would have guessed this is not a good idea.
- notch898a 4y ago"Your honor I shared my gmail password with someone else before the bail conditions were set."
- kube-system 4y agoThe classic "I didn't do it" defense.
- serf 4y agoa defense that gets stronger and more likely as human automation becomes more prevalent. checking your email earlier on in history meant more as a signal than it does now when 20 devices check an account 200 times a day automatically. (not to defend SBF, but I think a fair amount of us are checking our email a lot more often than when we actually touch a device.)
- throw10920 4y ago> You can even render the default network namespace barren such that any accidentally launched software has no network of any kind. This sounds extremely appealing. Do you have any quick-start resources for this, or do we just have to read the complete documentation for Linux namespaces?
- rogers18445 4y agoIt's just a few commands using the ip tool. You can read about it here: https://www.wireguard.com/netns/ https://www.wireguard.com/netns/ Wireguard is special in that after creating a wg0 interface you can move it to another namespace and its [encrypted] packets would be teleported into the namespace it started in. The link above has the wg0 being moved into the default/init namespace but you can move it anywhere.