7 ms·

I have to disagree. Going through a photo gallery is far more emotional and personal than browsing a two column grid.

• pxlpshr 15y ago
  Your argument doesn't compute. You're comparing content (photo gallery) with a design structure. The "two column" grid includes photos, locations, new friends, comments, etc.
  • thomasgerbe 15y ago
    Perhaps I should've been more specific. His argument was that scrolling down timeline is one of the most emotional experiences. Scrolling through a haphazard column system of photos of mishmash isn't that emotional to me. Going one by one through a persons Facebook album is more emotional to me because of the focus (one photo) and organization (I know which album I picked).
• swalsh 15y ago
  Photos are a pretty emotional experience, true. However I think there's a major difference. Typically photos on my facebook represent moments, short memories in time... mostly happy. Looking at a photo makes me remember the context of the photo. However a status update is different. They're more frequent, they're less significant. They give context around the less important things. For example, I remember the first time I looked at my timeline there was a status update that said something along the lines of "Oh man new doughnut at the Dunkin!" I wrote it a few years ago, and it was Completely pointless, and meaningless.. but then I remembered it, because later that day my mom was hit by a car. The entire events of that day flashed in my mind. Frankly that was pretty emotional for me.
  • nchuhoai 15y ago
    I'm sure Facebook, just like google and twitter try to find and display only relevant. Nobody is perfect
  • deleted 15y ago
    [deleted]