6 ms·
To me the argument makes more sense in reverse: Gitflow solves a problem few teams actually have. Throwing away a working (simpler) process of having a single
by mtzet 4y ago
To me the argument makes more sense in reverse:
Gitflow solves a problem few teams actually have. Throwing away a working (simpler) process of having a single trunk when there's no real benefit doesn't seem like a great idea.
It seems to me that Gitflow just adds a lot of ceremony of keeping multiple branches somewhat in sync through merges left and right.
I'm fine with the argument of keeping existing processes because they work, whatever they are.
- KyeRussell 4y agoI can tell you that every part of my team’s branch workflow is in service of something else. There is no pointless ceremony. We are a team of four, doing trivial work, in a trivial organisation. You can’t pretend that “you do your work at your desk, get up when you’re done, and hand it over” is just some misstep we all had.