4 ms·
It’s a good thing, I’m seeing less JS frameworks getting created now
by jjdeveloper 4y ago
It’s a good thing, I’m seeing less JS frameworks getting created now
- ugjka 4y agoI bet you can ask ChatGPT to code a a JS framework
- warning26 4y agoI asked for some names: "Naming a framework can be a crucial aspect of its success. It's important to choose a name that is memorable, catchy, and represents the core values and goals of the framework. Here are a few suggestions: Prodigy: A framework that aims to make web development simple and efficient. Velocity: A fast-performing framework that emphasizes speed and agility. Eon: A modern and innovative framework that incorporates the latest web development trends and technologies. Apex: A framework that emphasizes scalability and reliability, helping developers build robust and scalable applications. Fusion: A framework that seamlessly integrates different technologies, tools, and libraries to create a unified and seamless development experience." I'm looking forward to hiring a prodigy.js expert with 10 years of prodigy.js experience.
- nathias 4y agoOf course! I'd be happy to help you write a new JavaScript framework. Before we start, I'd like to ask a few questions to understand your goals and requirements for this framework: ....
- logicallee 4y agohttps://imgur.com/a/HModV0f https://imgur.com/a/HModV0f
- logicallee 4y ago>I bet you can ask ChatGPT to code a JS framework Tried it, it did okay on some high-level stuff but couldn't get to working code: https://imgur.com/a/HModV0f https://imgur.com/a/HModV0f Do you think it's fair to hold it to the task of instantly creating a new JavaScript framework from scratch and implementing it? This is a task that multiple experts planning and collaborating in different areas of software engineering could perform together with extreme difficulty over a long period. On the other hand, I was surprised that it came up with working, "correct" code for a difficult task: https://imgur.com/a/Y2kumZq https://imgur.com/a/Y2kumZq Pastebin for the code: https://pastebin.com/5JDvXtWi https://pastebin.com/5JDvXtWi I checked it and it is correct for n up to hundreds of thousands. (I'm not sure if that is really how matrix powers are supposed to work, but overall, its function returns correct exact solutions for the problem and worked without any modification.) I find both conversations I just linked pretty impressive in their own ways.
- wolpoli 4y agoOf course, it's tough to get people to adopt a new JS framework if ChatGPT can't emit the code for it. Stack Overflow is so old fashioned now.
- wg0 4y agoHilarious. Made me laugh. I remember there was a time when every other article was about VR on poptech websites.
- Existenceblinks 4y agoEnvy you seem not getting into tech twitter circle jerk yet. It's soul-crushing JS all the way down. Have you seen Typescript return type debate yet? Gosh I blocked them already.