6 ms·

Not surprising. Every company is going to take the opportunity to trim costs when it doesn't affect their PR as much as it would any other time.

mguerville 4y ago
And not doing so could affect their IR (investor relations) negatively, which is a higher concern than PR to most companies
- neon_electro 4y ago
  Why can't a company do offense on the IR front with literally any action other than cutting workforce? "Our products are better than ever" "Our revenue per employee is better than ever" Why does cutting costs have to be the only way to please investors?
  - cowsup 4y ago
    Because most investors are investing in more than one company. If someone has a stake in Google, Microsoft, and Confluent, and their ROI for the first two are great this quarter, but Confluent is lukewarm or even in the red, they're going to want an explanation. They can be told that products are great, or employees are producing a lot, but the only thing that matters to investors is the money. And so, when you're underperforming compared to others in your market, you have to do what appeases the shareholders, and that involves culling employees.
    - neon_electro 4y ago
      This needs to be a video game, not the way we organize humanity :(
  - brazzledazzle 4y ago
    I have no unique insight into their perspective but if I had to guess they're starting to worry about the lack of easy money and want a signal that management is going to play it safe with their current cash reserves instead of banking on another infusion. They probably could, you know, tell them as much, but sacrificing your employees really adds oomph to your commitment.
onlyrealcuzzo 4y ago
Every company that mishired. You don't cut costs if they aren't costs. If you hired employees to do something and they're making you money hand over fist, you don't fire them. They're not an expense. They're a profit center.

mguerville 4y ago

And not doing so could affect their IR (investor relations) negatively, which is a higher concern than PR to most companies

neon_electro 4y ago
Why can't a company do offense on the IR front with literally any action other than cutting workforce? "Our products are better than ever" "Our revenue per employee is better than ever" Why does cutting costs have to be the only way to please investors?
- cowsup 4y ago
  Because most investors are investing in more than one company. If someone has a stake in Google, Microsoft, and Confluent, and their ROI for the first two are great this quarter, but Confluent is lukewarm or even in the red, they're going to want an explanation. They can be told that products are great, or employees are producing a lot, but the only thing that matters to investors is the money. And so, when you're underperforming compared to others in your market, you have to do what appeases the shareholders, and that involves culling employees.
  - neon_electro 4y ago
    This needs to be a video game, not the way we organize humanity :(
- brazzledazzle 4y ago
  I have no unique insight into their perspective but if I had to guess they're starting to worry about the lack of easy money and want a signal that management is going to play it safe with their current cash reserves instead of banking on another infusion. They probably could, you know, tell them as much, but sacrificing your employees really adds oomph to your commitment.

onlyrealcuzzo 4y ago

Every company that mishired. You don't cut costs if they aren't costs. If you hired employees to do something and they're making you money hand over fist, you don't fire them. They're not an expense. They're a profit center.